9.
Jake "Scorpio" Fury emerged into Marvel's continuity of 1977 claiming to have spent a Biblical span of seven years creating;
" -- The Zodiac Chamber, the Theater of Genetics taken to it furthest imaginings! A new life form for each month of the year - - led by me!"
Like a small and exceptionally unpopular boy responding to isolation by creating a faux-friendship network of sock puppets and charity-shop action figures, Scorpio's final response to his endless failures had been to quite literally make his own friends. And so narrow is the distance between his sense of self and his understanding of others that he hails this programme as " ... the salvation of the world - - and as its creator, I suppose that makes me a savior....".
And since no-one except Jake Fury counts for anything where Jake Fury is concerned, it really does make perfect sense that the creation of a few android super-villains to serve as his duel-purpose chums and footsoldiers would carry with him the status of a world-saving project.
Yet the truly infantile and utterly confused nature of Scorpio's psyche is rather disturbingly revealed when we're shown exactly who and what constitutes the population of this android Zodiac.All but one of them is male, for example, and there's such a clear division of labour laid down between the ten not-men and the single not-woman that it's hard for the reader not to cringe at the thought of what's being learnt about the inside of Scorpio's empathy-less head. When the android that Scorpio's created to act as "Pieces" later dies before his maker's eyes, the "savior" is distraught, although tellingly not for the sake of the barely-born android fighting for his life before him;
"I wanted to share beers and long talks with you and the others, while we tried to get the world sane ..."
Putting aside the shiversome prospect of what exactly would constitute the process of getting "the world sane", it's immediately notable that what Scorpio is lusting after is the robot equivalent of a teenage gang to play much-feared and adored alpha male to. It seems painfully obvious that a sense of belonging is an experience that Jacob can only imagine by framing it in terms of a lonely and alienated childhood. Sharing beer and chatting forever with androids who in theory can only ever agree with their master is surely the opposite of society, and no marker of sanity either, but it's all that Scorpio can summon up to aspire to; a captive audience, the status of a beer-sharing big chief, and a grand plan to take over the world and restore its apparently lost sanity.
In this context, it's impossible not to see Scorpio's decisions to create only one female member of his new Zodiac as exceptionally telling, and, of course, thoroughly disturbing too. When faced just before his own suicide with the unborn android shell of his one female-esque creation, he rages that he'll "never hear you sigh, Virgo -- never feel your caress or know your embrace." She was, he declares, "... my last chance to be -- normal. I loved you, Virgo -- even though I never really knew you."
The gender roles of this new Zodiac are chillingly laid bare here. The blokes are for mateship, the bird is for physical comfort, and "love" is an emotion granted in return for services rendered. Most worrying of all is the sense that Virgo's perceived task was to bolster Scorpio's ego, to make him feel validated and "normal". No doubt Jake Fury has a concubine's role for Virgo pencilled in too, but in his distress at her destruction, it appears that he most regrets the loss of a soothingly loyal and nonthreatening female partner. In this, Virgo's role seems to have been designed as one far closer to that of a Mother than a lover, and the urge to feel securely psychologically attached appears a far more potent drive with Scorpio than eros. And it's surely telling that his final words to the wrecked mechanical carcase of his "Virgo" are quite different in tone and content to those he delivers to the dying Pieces;
"I'll never hear you sigh, Virgo -- never feel your caress or know your embrace. Virgo, how could you do this to me?"
It's Jake Fury's way, of course, to see other people's suffering in the light of his all-consuming self-obsession. But here his utter lack of concern for anyone else manifests itself in what to us can only seem like a very unpleasant idea indeed of what the role of women, and in particular lovers, should be. There's certainly a disturbing amount of resentment expressed here towards his blameless never-born lovebot, who is inconceivably being blamed for Scorpio's gamble on a premature activation of the Zodiac. Having effectively killed her, he's now maudlin at the thought of her betrayal, at her sinful decision to permit herself to be prematurely and effectively murdered by her maker.
But then, there's a great deal of resentment and anger expressed by Jake Fury at everybody and everything in the world. It's not just that he seems to be suffering from confusion about his sexuality. Rather, Scorpio is confused about everything. Is he for the war or against it? Does he loathe his brother or despise him? Is he a man who refuses to be crushed or a victim who knows that he has been? Scorpio is a man without any kind of calm and fixed sense of self beyond a conviction that he's been picked on, and by the whole of reality too. Most tragically, there's a part of Scorpio which knows that's he lacks such a necessary sense of self, and it's that which seems to drive him to invest a tremendous degree of will and words into denying to himself that any such problem of self-identity exists;
".. to maintain self-esteem, so many such attributes are necessary. Among them, the courage of your own convictions. A sense of purpose and identity. Self-confidence, self-sufficiency, and an especially strong concept of -- self. Otherwise, you fall prey to confusion or despair and are all too easily swallowed by society. Thus, in order to survive, I have become my own creation -- An image, an ideal! I have become Scorpio -- and I shall succeed!"
In this, the original emphasis on the question of "Who Is Scorpio?" in Jim Steranko's SHIELD tales is reframed in "The Defenders". Now, instead of the question referring to who it is that lies beneath the supervillain's mask, the question focuses on the fact that Jake Fury himself is a fundamentally disordered man. Everything about him fails to make sense unless it's viewed in the light of his own madness. His taste can seem cultured and informed, and yet his kitchen contains nothing but beer. He claims to loathe "having" to extort money from Kyle Richmond, defining such a business as "undignified", yet his throwing of a can of beer to the soon-to-be-murdered Moon Knight is, he declares, a clear sign of his own "class". Whether it's his sexuality, his morality, his class or his aesthetic identity, Scorpio is simply all over the place, as the distance between his declarations of principle and his actions illustrate. Consider, for example, his criticism of the America he's grown up in, which he damns for taking everyday citizens and brainwashing them;
“... into the system, the all important economy. Get a job, buy on credit, go to war, do whatever they tell you – or you’re a failure. Exchange your life for a house, car, TV. Work at a job you hate. Make compromises. Be a consumer ... Respect institutions. Be a willing party to your own moral and physical debilitation. Above all –be normal – or feel guilty ... Ask society no questions and it’ll tell you lies …"
And yet, what example does Jacob Fury offer in opposition to this Beat criticism of America? Nothing but murder, torture, theft, violence, and everything else that we might associate with the least knowing and most corrosive of tyrants.
10.
Of course, Jake Fury's words and actions can only be regarded as inconsistent if he's considered in the light of what we might call typical behaviour. As soon as we step away from that and judge his behaviour in its own terms, most of what Scorpio says and does is remarkable in its consistency. He never shows any understanding of, or indeed concern for, the well-fare of others. Moon Knight's execution is important only in that it helps Scorpio to make a point about modern manners. Virgo's stillborn corpse is a mark of an android who didn't care enough about her master to ensure that she was fully active and able to offer him her caresses. Jack Norris becomes little but a potential cheering section for a Scorpio who cannot understand why this man that he's kidnapped, and whose friends he's trying to torture and murder, shouldn't be on Jake Fury's side of the quarrel.
So convinced is Scorpio that everyone else - everyone else - is to blame for his own perceived persecution and suffering that he's set on creating a society that functions as he demands, rather than in any way altering his own thoughts and behaviour to adapt to the world beyond himself;
"Are you implying that I’m – alienated? Well – you’re right. I can’t relate to real people, I never learned how, so I’ve manufactured my own - - the Zodiac. They will understand me. They will see things my way.".
And when Scorpio's impulsive, gambling decision to prematurely activate the Zodiac speeds up the disintegration of his great plan, he's quite unable to recognise that he himself might have been responsible for his the collapse of his last great conspiracy against everything else. Instead, the whole of reality is blamed for acting as one in a great Cosmic anti-Scorpio conspiracy;
"Life is cruel .. It feeds on your hopes and ambitions and enthusiasms -- and uses them to destroy you"
"Life is cruel .. It feeds on your hopes and ambitions and enthusiasms -- and uses them to destroy you"
The Jacob Fury of 1944, who saw World War Two only in terms of how it served to make his brother appear to be more important than he was, is therefore fundamentally exactly the same man as the Scorpio of 1977.
11.
Quite what diagnosis might be made of Scorpio's disorder is beyond my ability to deduce. I'd be happy to be told that Scorpio's comicbook disorder matches none of the diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV-TR at all. Yet, what matters in four-colour terms is not that Scorpio's behaviour can be seen to follow those associated with any specific disorder, but rather the fact that his thoughts and actions can be perceived to be convincingly consistent on the printed page. And that's certainly true with Mr Kraft and Mr Giffen's work here. Not only is Scorpio a character who follows a clearly undeviatingly deviant path from beginning to end, but that path functions to make perfect sense of his backstory too.
Firstly, Scorpio seems to suffer from a form of mania which appears to typically be followed by recurrent states of despair. Secondly, he is almost utterly without empathy, and only ever once displays the slightest knowledge that his problems are to the slightest degree founded in his inability to integrate with society rather than with society itself. Thirdly, he's clearly delusional, and quite possibly paranoid; he really does believe in fate, and in a hostile universe that's deliberately conspiring to destroy him in what is to him the cruelest fashion possible. Fourthly, his behaviour fulfils just about every single one of the diagnostic criteria for psychopathy according to Dr Hare's PCL-R; from grandiose plans to implusivity, from superficial charm to shallow emotions, from grandiose self-importance to an utter failure to take responsibility for his own actions, Jacob Fury is at least a very strong candidate for testing and long-term detention. (Even the evidence of juvenile delinquency shown in the flashbacks to the family Fury's pre-war history in Strange Tales # 167 and Sgt Fury # 68 would encourage such a diagnosis.)
Whatever diagnosis might be made of Jake Fury's state-of-mind, and there may be more categories of mental disorder in the MU than in our somewhat-less fictional universe, Mr Kraft and Mr Giffen's Scorpio is portrayed as being so constantly and believably disordered that he's clearly not responsible for his actions. Though so much of his behaviour mirrors that of a thousand other supervillains of the period, here we're compelled to see Scorpio as an individual rather than just another antagonist, as a victim of his own psychology every bit as much as he is an undoubtedly disturbed and dangerous manl.
And so, Jake Fury's despair at the end of "Scorpio Must Die" inspires our empathy not because we recognise an individual who's redeemable, or a man who was pushed in any degree by uncaring others towards his final end. Sympathy for those who threaten order in superhero fiction is usually granted to those from the other side who have shown some kindness, reversed some terrible decision, revealed some possibility for change, stood by the superheroes as the universe threatened to fall. Jake Fury has displayed none of these signs of being the bad guy who we might feel slightly fond and sorry for. He's too obviously and irreversibly disordered, and he's committed, or tried to commit, too many despicable acts to be added to the comicbook list of bad guys of whom the reader is supposed to think somewhat well of. This isn't Namor or Hawkeye, The Black Widow or The Swordsman. He doesn't even carry the menance and tyrannt's glamour of a Doctor Doom, of an antagonist who we might ever want to see again. Scorpio is instead a helplessly dangerous man who could never be trusted to live freely even in the everyday society of the Marvel Universe. Worse yet, in comicbook terms, he's ultimately a pathetic and disturbing supervillain. It's certainly hard to imagine too many readers of the day clammering for a revival of Jack "Scorpio" Fury as an antagonist for their favourite superperson.
But the reader has been encouraged to understand Scorpio's misery, and regardless of whether we could ever envisage ourselves behaving as he has, we can certainly imagine feeling as helpless and hopeless as he does at the end of "Scorpio Must Die!". And we can certainly grasp that he was indeed always doomed to end up in one form or another of the escapeless situation that he finally traps himself in. Whether his Zodiac had been brought successfully to life or not, Scorpio was surely never going to recreate his life and the world around him in the fashion that he so vaguely, so very imprecisely, desired. He was ill-fated, he was damned, from the very start, and the only question was how many others would he damage as he spiralled down his own destruction.
In that sense, reality really was conspiring to constantly tempt and break Scorpio.
In that sense, reality really was conspiring to constantly tempt and break Scorpio.
We may be fundamentally different from Jake Fury, and yet, we too probably know we'd ever want to of what despair is, and we'll possibly recognise something of ourselves in that moment in which the 52 year old Scorpio finally surrenders to the ultimate logic of the disorder in his own mind;
"All my life, every time I've ever believed in anything, or had faith that the future would get better for me, I've had that false hope knocked out of me ... and found myself back on my knees in despair."
In such a way is our own empathy confirmed, which is surely, if I may be forgiven the expression of the thought, one of the most important functions of any fiction, regardless of whether it's trash-popular or some grand and U-Novel opus of great artistry. The irredeemably disordered and profoundly threatening Scorpio may not be able to feel any sympathy at all for the likes of us, but we're shown by Mr Kraft and Mr Giffen that we can feel such for him.
12.
Nobody beyond Scorpio's faithful LMD would ever know the horror that Scorpio lived with.
The second irony is similarly quite heartbreaking, for we realise, even as The Defenders and their allies don't, that the android Nick Fury had loved Scorpio very much. For all their bickering, and for the rather unpleasant violence that Jacob had inflicted upon it, the LifeModelDecoy had genuinely cared for Jake Fury, and it despairs at the loss of its partner. The presence of this final twist consolidates the tragedy of Scorpio's suicide, and of the life which preceded it, for Jacob himself had declared of the LMD;
".. he doesn’t have any feelings I can hurt. If it weren’t for the loneliness, I don’t even think I’d keep him around."
But the android had very real feelings, and Scorpio's despair and isolation might have been in some way assuaged if he'd known of that fact, although of course the very point of this sorry tale is that Jacob Fury could never have done so. More touching yet, we later learn that Nick Fury himself shares the sense of absolute loss that his android duplicate does.
"Scorpio Must Die" doesn't pretend that the self-slain supervillain could have been saved through therapy or, help us, lashings of love. It doesn't try to shift the blame off onto society, even as many of Scorpio's criticisms of America and the West carry a great deal of weight. It never attempts to convince us that the superheroes are the brutes here, that the law is an ass or that victims are in part to blame for the behaviour of the criminals who prey on them. It's not a tale that's sappy, soft-hearted or idealistic at all. It certainly never suggests that Scorpio is anything other than a profound danger to the public who should be locked away in the most secure of circumstances as possible,.
"Scorpio Must Die" doesn't pretend that the self-slain supervillain could have been saved through therapy or, help us, lashings of love. It doesn't try to shift the blame off onto society, even as many of Scorpio's criticisms of America and the West carry a great deal of weight. It never attempts to convince us that the superheroes are the brutes here, that the law is an ass or that victims are in part to blame for the behaviour of the criminals who prey on them. It's not a tale that's sappy, soft-hearted or idealistic at all. It certainly never suggests that Scorpio is anything other than a profound danger to the public who should be locked away in the most secure of circumstances as possible,.
But what it does express is something which this sub-genre simply doesn't say enough, and which it too often actually works, albeit unconsciously, to deny. It makes us understand that Scorpio, for all his difference and inhumanity, was a human being too. Costumed superfolks and their battles all too often encourage us to glorify in the defeat of the other, and catharsis is so often framed in the moment at which someone we've been encouraged to loathe is very badly hurt indeed, at which point it's too often obvious that we're supposed to cheer. And that's a terrible shame, and something of a secular sin too, because the genre has no need to be so unintentionally cruel, so dismissive and anti-social, as Mr Kraft and Mr Giffen's work in "The Defenders" illustrates.
No man being an island, and asking not for whom the bell tolls, and all of that ...
My very best to anyone who might have made it down to this line, and I wish you a splendid time in recompense for your patience! No man being an island, and asking not for whom the bell tolls, and all of that ...
.














Yes, if any question remained, that was indeed the scene I was thinking of.
ReplyDeleteHow telling that of all the Zodiac signs, Jake would choose Virgo for a consort! Other than the fact that Virgo is the only sign typically depicted as female in popular culture -- for that matter, Virgo was the only female member of the previous human-populated Zodiac led by Scorpio all the way back in Avengers #72 -- the choice is apt on a deeper level. Of course a Jake Fury could only want an untouched virgin for a love object. How could this perfect narcissist tolerate the thought of a lover having any lovers before him, or indeed any previous life at all? A woman he built himself would be the only woman he could find acceptable because that's the only kind he'd have no reason to feel jealousy over. Though one expects he'd have treated her about as well as he treated his punching-bag version of his brother…
(Also, this hangup adds extra resonance to his choice of that Judy Garland record. I couldn't say if this connection was something deliberately set up by Kraft and Giffen or merely something that felt intuitively "right" to them without premeditation, but it works either way.)
First read that story as a kid in Marvel UK's HULK COMIC. Always loved it. Caused a lifelong fascination with Keith Giffen's work, for starters. A lovely thoughtful series of pieces. You clearly have quite a capacity for empathy.
ReplyDeleteWhile on this theme, have you read the last Marvel SCORPIO? A three issue mini-series by Joe Casey and Nathan Fox. I recommend it.
Richard, those are wonderfully apposite points. Thank you! Reading what you’ve written has done what I’d have thought would’ve been impossible, which is to serve to actually raise the degree to which Jacob Fury disturbs me. Yes, I quite agree that he’d have been unable to behave fairly to “his” Virgo, and on reflection I suspect that he’d have started to drive himself mad with thoughts of whether she’d have loved him if she’d not been created to do so. A perfect woman built by his own hands would indeed be the only version of a lover that he could long for, I think you’re absolutely right, and the very fact that he’d had to build her would’ve probably destroyed whatever pathetic chance of contentment he’d have made for himself.
ReplyDeleteYet, some of his Zodiac utterly failed to tow the Scorpio line in the punch-up with the Defenders. What if Virgo had survived and decided that Jacob Fury was not the man for her? It just doesn’t bear thinking of. Better, in many ways, the terrible end he found, I suspect.
Oh, Mark, the very thought that you - or indeed anyone - read this story in Marvel UK's HULK COMIC. I know it reads it perfectly well as a straight if somewhat downbeat superhero tale, and yet, there's so much that's dark and disturbing going on under the surface. Yet, isn't that what the best children's fiction often has?
ReplyDeleteI had no idea there was such a Scorpio series as you mention. I'm really grateful for the nudge and am off to check it out now.
Empathy? I fear the worst, but I'm trying, Mark. There's no Zodiac vault under the chicken shed, I promise you.
DAK loved your column :-D That to me is so exciting. I didn't ask his permission to pass the comments along, but good job catching the music refs; I can't imagine he'd mind, but maybe he'll post, himself! He also has a new comic on its fourth issue: Yi Soon Shin. Pick it up, DAK fanatics!
ReplyDeleteThink on this: it's implied that Jake was raped in the arm. Er, the army.
Will you discuss the nuclear disaster issues?
Something perhaps pedantic, perhaps symbolic, is that Pisces and Virgo represent opposing signs, polarities lying on the same axis. Pisces, characterized by Mutable Water, the tempestuous month of impending growth and thawing snow, tends to carry the characteristics of dissolution, of the comfort of the Womb and isolation, of illusion. Virgo, Mutable Earth and the end of Summer, brings to mind the dry earth and the harvest, the solid, practical discernment, the Woman Unto Herself and the communication of the senses.
ReplyDeleteWith such a role of Virgo created to give Scorpio "normalcy," That this entire polarity, would disappear, his Wounded Victim/Savior and his Delineating Princess would both derail and send the Wheel would disengage... it's freaking brilliant.
This piece brought me to tears.
Hello Cease Ill:- I do hope Mr Kraft read the piece and saw the respect for his work there. The mistakes that I'm sure are there are, I fear, an inevitable part of the process of such blogging, though I don't mean by that they're acceptable. But the respect should be self-evidant and it'd be heartening to think that had been conveyed.
ReplyDeleteThank you again for your generous words :) There is indeed an awful lot in that Defenders run that I'd like to write about, the nuclear/Red Guardian material among it.
Hello Ben:- I don't think that's pedantic material at all. I realise now that I ought to have dug deeper into the astrological meaning of the piece, and I should have realised that work which was so careful in how it used information would have used astrological material in a deliberate and informative fashion. I appreciate you bringing your knowledge and interpretation to these comments, and I'm glad there was some value in the discussion of this fine run of comics for you.
ReplyDeleteHi Colin! Thanks for such a thought-provoking analysis of one of my favourite comics stories. Even at the age of 10 when I first read "Who Remembers Scorpio?" I realised it was something special, something more melancholy and downbeat than the average Marvel mag of the day. ( Apart from all the superhero battles, of course! )
ReplyDeleteThe last two pages, showing Scorpio finally succumbing to madness and depression and taking his own life, were eye-opening for me at the time. This wasn't like Doctor Doom being lost in space / shrunk down to a subatomic level / losing his memory - Scorpio wasn't coming back from this final act of desperation; there would be no triumphant return, accompanied by much cackling and exposition. Not this time...
And, even though the reader couldn't find sympathy for such a deluded monomaniac, someone else could: the Nick Fury LMD. When "Fury" answers Moon Knight's question "...who'll miss a maniac like Scorpio, anyway?" with a quiet "I will", the full irony of the story hits home. The love and respect Jake Fury had craved had been there for the last seven years in the form of an android replica of his hated brother. But, as you said, the deluded Scorpio couldn't ( or wouldn't ) see it.
BTW, Colin, your closing comments that Scorpio "was a human being too" are spot-on and remind me of the very last page of Marv Wolfman's Tomb Of Dracula, where we are reminded that "Dracula was a man, and never should that be forgotten".
Again, thanks for this wonderful series of posts on a minor classic. Keep up the great work!
Hello cerebus660:- what a comic to be reading at 10 years old! I suspect that there's a relatively huge number of folks wandering around today who can remember something of the end of Defenders # 50, regardless of whether they stayed reading comics or not. I realise its nothing but the least trustworthy of suspicions, but I do have a feeling that it's a comic which will have caught in people's memory, and I'm glad to have heard from good folks such as yourself on the matter of being young and soaking up all this difference in the guise of the exceedingly familiar.
ReplyDeleteI love the way that you refer to sequence of events on the last page, and to the detail of the dialogue. I know that its a scene that I've returned to every few years and I too know it very well. Ironically, I started this piece just intending to discuss the last two pages of # 50, and in the end I didn't touch on the 18 panel organisation of Jacob Fury's last moments at all. Ah, well. Blogging is a medium which allows digression, and I suspect that may be a world record digression, given that I never actually arrived at my main intended topic in the first place :)
That's an apt and telling association with the last issue of TOD you mention, and it's got me thinking that I must go haul out my Dracula Essentials to read that tale. You're absolutely right that both stories make no excuses for the acts of their antagonists, but they don't disguise the all-too-flawed and yet all-too-important humanity of them either.
Thank you for your thoughts. I'm off to Wolfman/Colan/Palmer land, I feel!
I have the first few parts of this story, but not the conclusion. I bought them when I was collecting Steve Gerber back issues, and was slightly annoyed that the Gerber issues ended before them. I read them anyway, and was surprised by how enjoyable they were. Giffen's blatant Kirby impression was pretty brazen, but Klaus Janson's inks made it work. I've only seen Kraft's name in a few comics- What If...?, Son of Satan (IIRC)- and I wonder why he didn't write more.
ReplyDeleteI remember you writing that you weren't sure you wanted to reread ToD because it might not live up to your memories, but I'm sure you'll find value in the experience regardless (even if it's as a lesson in not going home again).
Excellent write-up on the Defenders issues!
- Mike Loughlin
Hello Mike:- I doubt there were many folks at all who were pleased that Steve Gerber was removed from The Defenders by Gerry Conway during the latter's brief editorial reign. (I hope I've got that right, mind you.) And I've no doubt that the response to Mr Kraft's work suffered as a result of that; the Gerber issues really were SO good, despite suffering from fill-ins. Because of that, the run which followed after Mr Conways swift departure has been unfairly ignored. Certainly, # 50 on it’s own is in many ways the equal of any of Mr Gerber’s splendid issues.
ReplyDeleteI must say, I wonder how I'd've remembered the story if I'd not read the final part. Those last two pages seem to me to be the key to that whole run from 46 to 50. I think you're right to say they're enjoyable. It's only reading back from Scorpio's end that the run becomes something more touching too, or so I suspect. But the run-in issues are indeed good fun as they stand :)
On Mr Giffen's pencils; I agree wholeheartedly with what you say. It made me smile to see that Mike Royer actually inked # 49, which really did cause the Kirbyness to shine out. Yet by # 50 Mr Giffen was using aspects of Mr Kirby's work in a way which the master never chose to; nine panel pages which drew off the later Kirby's style, for example.
I think I can recall saying that very thing about ToD too, Mike. Yet I find now that I rarely read a comic that I once loved and find anything other than a great deal to admire and enjoy. Folks have told me that they've become more cynical through blogging about the things they love, but I find it's restored something of my original unconditional love of the medium. It's not that I can't spot problems, or at least problems according to my POV; but the presence of a few problems can't be allowed to obscure all the good work present too.
Overall, I find that blogging is bringing out my latent optimism! Thanks for the kind words, and I hope the evening finds you well.
Hello kingbeauregard:- as Sir Humphrey used to state in "Yes Minister", you may choose to say that, but I couldn't possibly :)
ReplyDeleteBeautiful critical writing about some great comics.
ReplyDelete---------------------------------------------------
One suggestion: Can you link multipart essays to one another? I just stumbled upon this blog & the navigation is harder than it needs to be. If "part one", for example were a link when presenting "part two" and so forth, it would be helpful.
Thank you for your kind words.
ReplyDeleteYour suggestion is a good one. I've actually just started to do just that, but it would be a fair thing to work backwards and link pieces together. My apologies for the inconvenience, and thanks for persevering.
Colin, it was neat to see links appear on the Daredevil post headers almost magically the next time I stopped by your blog. Thanks! (At the very least I needed to revise my anonymity.)
ReplyDelete---------------------------------------------------
I read most of these 1970's comics at a formative stage & so absorbed much of that generation of scripters' language in a the same automatic spirit in which much of it appears to have been generated. MacGregor & Gerber, even at their worst were mindful creators though probably if I go back & reread I suspect I would still encounter plenty of degenerated Lee-isms. True Believer.
Anyhow, this is a delicious distraction, thanks for shining a critical light on these comics.
Hello Steven:- good advice is always welcome here, and it's good to make your acquaintance.
ReplyDeleteYou might be surprised what you'll find if and when you go back to the era of the true True Believer. I always am. I'm currently doing a piece on the Gerry Conway Daredevil of 72/3 and it's a remarkable run of comics. Some of it IS 'degenerated Lee-isms", but because the context in which they appear has changed, so has the meaning of the Marvel-speak. It's a wonderfully mutated beast, and in many ways far more interesting, if not as accomplished, than some of today's front running books.
I'm glad you found something of value here. I hope the day has been a kind one for you.