Wednesday, 27 July 2011

"Zeeshan":- Kieron Gillen & Jamie McKelvie’s Generation Hope # 9; On Making The Superhero Protest Story Work (Part 1 of 2)

Please be warned; spoilers! Really substantial, I'm-not-exaggerating, spoilers!


1. Tell A Story, Avoid A Lecture

There’s a continent or twelve’s worth of difference between text and sub-text, but you’d not know that where most superhero protest stories are concerned. Most writers called to this beguilingly worthy cause or that compellingly urgent one seem to have mistaken their obligation to entertain for a license to lecture. In their excess of ethicalness, they forget their responsibility to tell an absolutely engrossing story about the folks in the silly costumes who fly through the sky and punch through brick walls. They inform, but they don’t inspire, they preach, but they don’t persuade, and they puff and puff and puff without making the business of blowing down whatever particular house it is they're discussing any more of a compelling prospect. After all, if folks were moved by facts and feelings and sincere exhortations, what would be the need for a protest story in the first place? In that one key sense, good intentions are not unlike a host of other politically vital resources from food aid to weapons of mass destruction. Without a viable delivery mechanism, all of them are fundamentally useless, if not worse.

          
"Better" is, in Kieron Gillen’s words. “the one where we’re using the X-Metaphor to talk about teenage gay suicide”, but that context could’ve been stripped from the story and there’d still have been a moving and involving tale left on the page concerning the limitations of good intentions and the cruelty of fate. No, a Generation Hope # 9 which had had that specific use of the 'X-Metaphor’ removed wouldn’t have jabbed at the limbic system and provoked such anger, and it wouldn’t have messed with the empathy circuits and inspired such regret, but it would’ve still been exciting and it would’ve still inspired sadness and reflection. It would’ve featured the likes of the pulse-raising scene of Transonic's race against fate as she powered her way across the Atlantic is a desperate and ultimately futile attempt to save Zee’s life, even if the cause of his distress in a less-specific narrative would've perhaps been nothing more contentious than the complications of his emerging mutation. It could’ve presented Hope’s realisation that her mission will inevitably involve failure and a constant re-evaluation of her principles and purpose. It would have been a story that was composed of action and emotion and in its own terms, quite separate from Mr Gillen's more deliberate moral purpose, it would've worked.

         
But it wouldn’t have been nearly as good a comic book. Because in Better, the social protest doesn't eclipse the story, but powers it. And without that focus on a loathing of homophobia, without the rage and the purpose to which it's been put, the remaining tale of superheroes too late to save a potential comrade from the consequences of his mutation would've been far, far weaker, far more run of the mill. Certainly the absolutely vital closing debate concerning the virtues of revenge and restraint would’ve been almost impossible to shoehorn so movingly into the tale, leaving just another story of super-powers and super-conflict. More important yet, of course, Generation Hope # 9 wouldn’t have stood as an unpretentiously heartfelt mark of sympathy and solidarity with those young and entirely blameless folks persecuted to their deaths simply because of their sexuality and the bigotry of their peers.

But then, why would any such censored narrative ever need appear? Why would anyone want the superhero comic gutted of social and political content, when the very presence of such can make it all the more powerful and moving? For it's a myth that politics and the superhero book somehow work to each other's disadvantage, and Better very much proves that. What’s that ‘X-Metaphor’ for anyway?

             
2. The Problem Raised Must Never Be Solved

There’s always the worry that the raised spirits and sense of community inspired by singing of the likes of “Feed The World” will leave the singers feeling that the world has somehow actually been fed. So it is with the superhero protest book. A comic which closes with the reader feeling that even the tiniest amount of a social problem has been dealt with is one which runs the risk of transmitting a sense that things aren’t actually that bad after all. And so the script and art of Better work hard to ensure that the raw frustration and fury inspired by Zee’s impossibly lonely end remains undiminished at the story's close. In places, doing so proves a technically demanding business, and it at times involves the hiding of some dubious but necessary plot-holes in plain sight in order to emphasise how very common homophobia is and how little punished are its practitioners. For example, so understandably keen is Mr Gillen not to give the impression that the loathsome Luke has been suffering for his bigotry that he shows him still living in University accommodation “four weeks

          
after Zee’s death. Of course, it’s important that there’s no sense in the narrative that Luke has been brought to book, because that would undercut the fact that our real-world societies really aren’t making the appropriate efforts to engage with this issue. It's easy to carelessly suggest on an emotional level in a comicbook that the causes of a social problem are easy to identify and deal with. Consequently, Luke needs to be shown living the life that he had before he drove Zee to suicide, to accentuate the point that terrible things occur and yet all those Lukes are still out there living as if they were decent and typical folks, as if they'd never done such unforgivable things to the folks they've persecuted. But there’s few if any Universities in Britain which wouldn’t have had Luke at the very least suspended and awaiting a hearing as a result of the facts of Zee's suicide. Put simply, it's impossible to believe that Luke hasn't been turfed out long before four weeks have passed. (It's hard not to imagine civil rights groups not making his life in halls a living hell too.) Yet Better cleverly misdirects the reader with the pace of its telling and the content of its narrative, so that the quandary of Luke’s inexplicable presence in the University of Sheffield's halls stays in the background, where it of course belongs. For this is a story designed to make us long for resolution while ensuring that we never receive it. In places, therefore, there's a clear conflict between what most likely would happen and what it's necessary to show, and the latter always cleverly and surreptitiously wins out.

            
Similarly, it doesn't make a great deal of sense that Luke, and perhaps one or two of his fellow persecutors, are standing together in the open when Hope and her fellow mutants arrive at the scene of Zee's death. Unless he's been corralled there by Transonic, which the text gives no indication of, or unless he's waiting there for the police and/or the University authorities, which is never suggested, logic tells us that Luke should be anywhere but. (Laurie, for example, has already witnessed his complicity, and probably that of a good few others, in Zee's death.). Yet the narrative needs them all there, to allow their numbers and their freedom and Luke's presence among them to counterpoint Zee's lonesome and anonymous corpse, and to inspire the reader to identify the problem of homophobia as being of a far broader nature than that of a few bad eggs stinking up a kindly, liberal world.  And such is the contempt and loathing of Luke and his fellow mutantphobic rubber-neckers that Mr Gillen quite rightly inspires, that it's hard to notice that perhaps it makes no sense for all of those characters to be on stage there at all. Their presence is needed to place Luke's barbarity once more into its wider context, and so the narrative is designed to carry us past any such quibbles of logic with the force of the emotions inspired and the implications generated.

       
To that end, we're never ever allowed to focus to any great degree on Luke and his personal motivations separate from the bigotry and ignorance of the wider culture after Zee's mutation begins. At that point, Mr Gillen's script starts to concentrate far more on the blogosphere's encouragement of Luke's prejudice, of his mutantphobia, and upon the lack of will there is even on the part of Zee's friends to challenge what's being done to him. And so Luke's behaviour is reinforced by the 'number of hits' his photos of Zee's distressful state generates, and we're shown the cowardice and therefore complicity of those who witness the plight of Zee but don't immediately intervene, and the point is so emphasised that this is not an individual problem, even as a great many individuals are helping to create it. It's simply not an issue that can be explained with reference to just Luke, a few friends of his friends, and the dead-heartened, cruel and cowardly. bigots that they are. It's a truth that emphasised by how Mr McKelvie's art scrupulously avoids presenting those who're actively bullying or passively failing to help Zee as stereotypically 'evil'. Indeed, they're often far more conventionally attractive than many of the X-Men themselves.
       
And so, though we can recognise some of the folks who're on the right side of Better by the costumes that they;re wearing, it's considerably more difficult to spot the folks that they're meant to be opposing, which in that sense at least makes Marvel's Earth no different to ours. At every stage of Generation Hope # 9, the implication is that the beating up of two or three despicably callous students by the X-Men, or the destruction by a phasing Kitty Pryde of a hundred or so I-Phones and computer screens, simply won't affect the fundamentals of the problem at all. A few costumes knocking around a few students simply won't change anything, and yet that's what superheroes do; they hit things and they make them alright. Cleverly, Mr Gillen turns this impotence on the part of Hope and her fellow mutants to his purpose. He doesn't leave his superheroes on the periphery of his polemic so much as he puts them to use within it as a symbol of the limitations of punitive power in the face of widespread prejudice and apathy. The solution to the appalling problem, he suggests, is not a few show-trials, the odd significant punishment and a pretense that everything's alright now.  Instead, Zee is dead, and there's no meaningful revenge or salvation or closure to be found, which is why the story succeeds in agitating rather than pacifying, and why it inspires a genuine sympathy rather than a well-meaning but patronizing pity. Zee didn't die because he wasn't quite brave enough or bright enough or strong enough; his suffering, quite contrary to logic of the superhero narrative, was entirely beyond his own control. It not only didn't reflect his own fine qualities, but it occurred despite them. Similarly, his suicide wasn't the consequence of the mutants being late or because some super-villainous hidden hand manipulated events. He's not an excuse for the X-Men to feel even more sorry for themselves, or a way of stirring up a soap-operatic angst to add some tearful grit to their story, or even a victim to trigger a good old fashioned conflict with a Brotherhood of Evil Mutants or whomever. No, it was the banality of evil that did for him, which throws the question of responsibility back upon the reader.

Or, as Hope says at the end of her time in the story; "We have to be better." Not 'they', or 'he', or 'she', but we.


               
.
to be concluded;

.

9 comments:

  1. Wow! The villain is wearing a "Bacon is a Vegetable" shirt! http://store.dieselsweeties.com/products/bacon-is-a-vegetable-shirt
    So he's a geek, and a fan of a pretty great webcomic (Diesel Sweeties), one that definitely shows a lot of concern for social issues- the alienation and second-class status of robots, for example, but also has humor that sometimes can be pretty brutal. What a great choice! I wonder if it was Gillen or McKelvie's idea?

    Good to see protest comics going beyond that "what have you done for the Blue Skins/Black skins?" type of story- I know it was revolutionary at the time, but jeez, is it cringe-inducing to read now. Obviously, it helps that the X-Men were designed from the beginning to function as persecuted minorities.

    Also, man, what a difference from the Greg Land art! McKelvie's is so much less flashy, so much less bright and dazzling- from the panels scanned, could almost be mistaken as boring- but you can tell there's a sense of storytelling and economy. 

    ReplyDelete
  2. I haven't read Generation Hope #9 (Though after this I might go pick up my copy!) but I really enjoyed the article, from the acknowledgement at the beginning of the dangers of ham-handing social issues into stories, and then the analysis of how the story provokes its intended aims.

    This statement in particular caught my eye:

    "Zee didn't die because he wasn't quite brave enough or bright enough or strong enough; his suffering, quite contrary to logic of the superhero narrative, was entirely beyond his own control. It not only didn't reflect his own fine qualities, but it occurred despite them."

    No doubt. But does that make suicide his fault? Again, I haven't read the story, but though I am sure all of the prejudiced characters bear much blame (as they should), the ultimate choice of whether or not to commit suicide is up to the person who does it - in this case, Zee. There is always a choice - I do not say this to belittle young men and women who go through horrific prejudice - I say it because there is only one person's actions that you can control (even if you have superhuman powers and can administer the punitive pummelings that have been the subject of many superhero comics) and that is yourself.

    I've not decided what I think of suicide. I hesitate to say that it is black and white wrong or right (As nothing really is), but I will say that there is always a choice, and suicide doesn't seem to me to be a good option in all but the most dire of cases.

    That does not mean other people should not take responsibility for their actions against other humans. Nor does it mean that homophobia is not a problem, nor does it mean that a human cannot affect another human, or that we should not take responsibility for how we treat others. But it does mean that ultimately the choice to kill, either another or oneself, rests with each person's soul.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello Historyman:- that's a terrific catch with the 'Bacon' reference. There's quite alot more that I’d like to talk about with GH9, but I think I'll need to have to step back, think again and try to do a far better job, and your catch of a cultural reference points to something else I need to rethink. My thanks.

    Still, reading your comment, I’m pleased that I at least did manage to say say how much GH9 is work to be respected and, of course, enjoyed.

    The comparison between GL's art and JM's is something I was thinking of earlier this week. Mr McKelvie's work is so informed by a fundamental smartness matched with a good hearted joy in the way that folks communicate with each other. Mr Land DOES have virtues to his work, which is why I wish he'd drop the flash and PF and focus on what he could undoubtedly achieve. Mr McKelvie's already there, already doing a fine job in form and content. In many ways, and I never realised this until yesterday, he reminds me of Steve Ditko and his concentration on character in his early Sixties work. Still, that's another piece, a comparison that’d need explaining and justifying.

    The economy of good storytelling. Tis a thing to be respected, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello David: “I haven't read Generation Hope #9 (Though after this I might go pick up my copy!) but I really enjoyed the article, from the acknowledgement at the beginning of the dangers of ham-handing social issues into stories, and then the analysis of how the story provokes its intended aims.”

    It’s a great comic, Dave. I think, from your writing, that you’d very much enjoy it, and that the craft would appeal to you almost as much as the story, which is of courtse always the thing …

    ”No doubt. But does that make suicide his fault? Again, I haven't read the story, but though I am sure all of the prejudiced characters bear much blame (as they should), the ultimate choice of whether or not to commit suicide is up to the person who does it - in this case, Zee.”

    I totally understand your point, Mr D. I think that the comic does a great deal to frame the situation, in terms of ‘facts’ and emotions, and that it’ll inspire you in the question you ask if you pick it up. Despite a few problems which if/when I return to this I’d like to discuss, I think the case it makes is an exceptionally strong one that Luke and the anomie-ridden culture he belongs to IS culpable for Zee’s suicide. I certainly believe so.

    The real-world cases which this story refers to – of Tyler Clementi and Asher Brown and their peers – are examples, I believe, of individuals being driven to the point by the uncaring, the cruel, the bigoted to a point where life to them wasn’t worth the living because it quite simply wasn’t bearable. My opinion is that an individual, particularly but by no means exclusively during the already-incredibly challenging period of adolescence, is likely to be ferociously wounded on a series of utterly profound levels by a savage rejection of their very nature and by the overwhelming cruel way in which that is done. To face that day in and day out, and/or to fear that’ well, that’s not life, that’s torture. Add to that the sense of meaningless which swells when a world which pronounces its own virtues and offers so little help and so little prospect of support and promise; to have your very nature denied, to see no end to the cruelty, to be bearing such an appalling weight; no, I think that such things would undoubtedly cause – not contribute to, but cause – a person to feel that they just can’t bear to live in each subsequent moment anymore. It’s not hard to fracture even the strongest of people if the right stress point is found and hammered. To hammer away in the most savage of ways at individuals who are already coming to terms with a nature which they know through no fault of their own will bring them into conflict with others; well, I know that adolescence, for example, was tough enough for me as a heterosexual in a heterosexual environment. But if I’d not even been able to express emotions quite natural to me, if I’d not even been able to admit to feeling love and desire and a longing for community and solace simply because of who I was, and if those essential qualities of myself brought not just ostracism and an impossible loneliness, but the terrors of persecution … I dread to think, Dave, I really do.

    cont;

    ReplyDelete
  5. cont;

    And the comic does kaleidoscope in those qualities into a brief moment in order to discuss that most intense of uncaring, that despicable process of the reduction of another human being to a commodity for other’s contemptible and cruel pleasures. In doing so, it summons up that sense of feeling in despair that there’s nowhere in the world which will make the effort to help. Where Zee is concerned – and I do encourage you to go and seek this out – he has already been made to worry, to say the least, about the whole process of mutation and about its physical and social consequences by the media,; he exists in a culture where the business of mutation has become fetishised quite separate from any moral context; he’s already undergoing all the challenges and changes of late adolescence; and then he undergoes a complete physical transformation which is utterly unpredictable and which seems to strip him of identity and any capacity to understand or predict his next moment, let alone the future, and what does he face? In his terror, the very society he’s seen himself as part of doesn’t help him, or comfort him, or get him to medical and psychological help, and so on. His situation is that he’s locked away and reduced to the focus of the cruellest of ‘entertainments’. In such extreme circumstances – and of course the metaphor in GH9 is one which carries a sense of necessary outrage and a general description of such persecution rather than an absolutely precise metaphor for the victim of homophobia, because documentary realism isn’t the point here – I think Zee’s suicide is absolutely one which he’s not responsible for. I think his situation would have broken a great many folks. I wouldn’t put myself outside of their number. No, I wouldn’t at all.

    ”.. but I will say that there is always a choice, and suicide doesn't seem to me to be a good option in all but the most dire of cases.”

    Well. I can see how that looks. And as an old, old man compared to you, Dave, I have known friends – including the most fundamentally kind and, yes, decent man I ever, ever knew – take their own lives. (I wrote about it on this blog in ‘How Many Dead People Have You Seen Today?”) And I would say – without suggesting you meant anything other than an honest and open discussion – that anyone who commits suicide is already suffering the most dire of cases. That degree of self-harm indicates that in a variety of ways, the individual is already at the point where life is not something they can bear to continue with. Suicide is always the most dire of cases.

    ”But it does mean that ultimately the choice to kill, either another or oneself, rests with each person's soul.”

    And as I say, I understand why you would say that. My experience is that that isn’t so, that good and strong people can be broken to the point where the only way to stop the pain is to stop everything. I’ve seen it several times in my life. As far as I can grasp, there are none of us who can’t be broken. In that, we’re all responsible for each other, and some are directly and absolutely, in terms of their sins of omission and commission, responsible for others killing themselves. The degree of that is a complex matter which shifts from case to case. But the fact of the fundamental point for me is absolutely so.

    Thank you for raising such an issue so honestly. I may disagree with you here, but that doesn’t mean I insist anyone else share my opinion or indeed that my opinion is right. But I think Mr Gillen and Mr McKelvie are expressing an emotional truth here, as well as suggesting some very profound real-world issues too which inform it. One for the pull list, I really would suggest.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for highlighting this issue -- the comic issue AND the social issue!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Brainy Pirate:- that's very kind of you to say. And of course in my turn, I really do need to say how much I appreciate Mr Gillen and Mr McKelvie doing such a fine job of work here, of course. It's heartening to see the sub-genre being put to such good use. AFter all, Superman began the superhero tale fighting against lynching, state corruption and wife beating. The protest story has been part of the superhero's DNA since day 1, minute 1.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'll probably end up reading this story in trade (unless a good sale happens at the local comic shop) but I have to seek it out. It sounds too vital to miss. It sounds like this is how you use comics to comment on the real world without making it preachy. Your response to David was spot-on, too. Suicide is horrible, and there are no easy answers.

    Did you ever read the similar issue of New Mutants, number 45, the one with the Marvel 25th Anniversary full-face portrait (of Magik, by BWS) surrounded by a frame of Marvel characters? I read it in my early-teen years and found it very effective. In that issue, a mutant with a harmless power (to create statues made of light) commits suicide after threatened with being outed to mutant hunters. Claremont & Guice did a great job constructing the story (including a scene in which the young mutant meets the New Mutants, unaware that they are mutants, and starts telling mutant jokes to fit in). I wonder if that issue was the inspiration for GH9.

    - Mike Loughlin

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello Mike:- you know what, 'vital' is a good word for this story. It's not flawless, because no story that aims this high can be so. It's just not possible to design a flawless text for such a social problem AND make it work within the context of this sub-genre. BUT it IS very good indeed, and it's very good on the level of a superhero story too. It's not worthy, it's ANGRY, and yet it discusses the limits of revenge too. Yep. It's a good book.

    On the issue of suicide, I do think that Dave, your good self and the blogger are all united in recognising what a terrible business it is. And I think that another virtue of GH9 is that raises the issues of who is responsible in such situations. I'm going to come back to that, but I suspect that the discussion that's gone on here about the degree of free will in such a situation is exactly the kind of thing which a social protest book should inspire. Western culture is hardly one that sees but a few suicides, let alone just a little self-harm in all of its sadly almost-endless forms, and yet we talk so little of it. I'm absolutely sure David would agree 100% with your last sentence in your first paragraph, and as you suggest with your last five words there, the debate about free will in this situation is always worth having.

    WHAT a good recommendation that New Mutants issue. I have no knowledge of it at all, but you can be sure that I'll hunt it down post-haste. Whatever the relationship between the issues, it strikes me that it'd be really interesting to compare the one with the other. It's off to E-Bay for me, then, Mike. Thank you for the steer! :)

    ReplyDelete