In which the blogger continues his review of 2011, which was begun here, and continued here and here. There's a brief recap of how the "best" and "worst" were chosen at the bottom of this page;
5. Problem The Fifth:- The Absolute Dominance Of The Event
If the definition of madness is the repeated use of methods which have long since proven themselves ineffectual, then the comics industry is in at least significant part insane. When Marvel Comics declared in the autumn of 2011 that their three major crossovers of the year were all leading into the publisher's major Event for 2012, irony, if not the profoundest of irritation, became redundant. There is no satire on the concept of the Event which could trump that irony-free statement of company policy. The solution to the declining appeal of a company whose product has once again become dependent on Event books is, it seems, to tie all its separate Events together into a very big Event indeed. The faithful ingenuity of the whole process inspires not admiration and
anticipation, but rather despair. For comics have become an insanely expensive and never concluding
scavenger hunt, with consumers trudging from book to book in order to find the
clues and mysteries which will, rather than delivering satisfaction,
drive them on to even more product and even more hunting and even more exceptionally delayed gratification.
The very earliest signs of what we'd now call an Event in the Marvel Revolution books of the early Sixties were at least as much motivated by profit as they were by playfulness and ambition. There never was a golden age when art perpetually trumped profit. The very first Amazing Spider-Man Annual from 1964, for example, saw the reader presented with a sequence of cameos by each of Marvel's line-leading properties, though none of them were in any way central to the plot. As each character disappeared back in the direction of their own quite separate adventures, a blurb was placed on the page advertising the fact that, for instance, "Mighty Thor appears each month in his own magazine, as well as in The Avengers". But then, The Sinister Six was also a 41-page self-contained story too, complete with dense and transparent and innovative storytelling, and the crossover material, such as it was, served as added value to the narrative's obvious virtues rather than as an alternative to them.
There was certainly a considerable irony in the fact that the New 52 was intended to be as reader-inclusive as it could be, and yet it still functioned just as any Event of scale traditionally has. Rather than feeling like a consumer-friendly, hit-the-beach-running collection of deliberately individual and separate books, the New 52 carried a sense of being no less monolithic and inorganic and centre-driven than anything pumped out in 2011 by Marvel. Indeed, the whole year felt like one marketing campaign stomping on another. That the comics of the New 52 were intended to be light on backstory and gentle in their cross-title complexity was
undeniable. Yet the new titles have inevitably begun to generate their own intricate and even contradictory backstories, and it already looks very much as if the new boss is going to look - as they tend to - very much like the old one, sans the deep history of the established DCU which was so - quite literally - unceremoniously discarded. The grandest exercise in meta, therefore, DC's New 52 took the concept of the
immersive universe and, having thrown its readers out of one quarter
century of continuity, invited them to buy into another fantastical world based on
the concept that everything you've learned is, yes, significantly wrong, but also, in large part, right as well. This was not a fresh start so much as as the most overwhelming Event of all, combining the opportunity cost of all that had been dumped with the physical expense of all that was on offer.
Whatever the intentions, the sense of same-as-it-ever-was soon returned, and that's especially so given that the New 52 was launched off the back of a shamefully lacklustre and protracted Flashpoint crossover. No matter how DC might allow each individual book to carve out its own
distinct territory quite separate from any grand marketing marketing plans in
2012, this year's reboot looked and walked and talked like the most bloated of all Events. Everything
in the mainstream of 2012 felt like an Event, or rather, it did with the exception of
those moments when the babble from Marvel and DC briefly died down and the reader knew - just
knew - that yet another Event was about to be announced. It all too often felt, quite frankly, as if the reader was being regarded as nothing more than a highly susceptible consumer. Combine DC's all-or-nothing reboot with Marvel's apparent determination to micro-manage the
continuity of its books, and 2011 was just yet another year in which both of the
Big Two seemed far more like advertising agencies working hand-in-hand
with accountants than they ever did pop publishing houses.
Only, more so.
New readers, no doubt, saw the 52 as a dream of a jumping-on point, and yet, how many of those mythical starting-from-zero readers actually were there? By DC's own account, the project was aimed not at the new consumer, but at the lapsed one, meaning that such a massive project had remarkably limited aims. Sadly, that fresh-ish start was marked by the perpetuation of much of the same old hack-friendly storytelling orthodoxies, meaning that what the reader received was often simply a great more of what had come before. A new coat of paint, then, but too often the same read-it-in-minute product underneath. A jumping on point, yes, but what was it that neophytes and the returnees were leaping onto? Without a radical reinvention of how the superhero story itself was told, the old
scavenger hunt beckoned once again, with the hope that all of this mostly-thin plenty would eventually pay off somewhere down the line.
It's surely certain that an investment of the budget which was allocated to the New 52, combined with a commitment to the highest standards of storytelling, would have significantly boosted the sales of the old DCU too. Of course, there were undoubtedly good books in the
relaunch. From Wonder Woman to Demon Knights, from Action to
Batwoman, there were comicbooks to enjoy and some even to celebrate, but there was nothing about any of them which absolutely required the Event of the New 52. In that, all the column-inches and market-share was bought at a considerable and arguably unnecessary cost. For
most books, the whole process was nothing more than the equivalent of placing a set of new, flashy, and tackily-made clothes
onto an already potentially attractive individual who unfortunately just wouldn't wash enough. It all looked
new and enticing from a distance, but too often, as the reader got closer and closer and closer ....
That the problem with most of 2011's Events lay far more in the storytelling of the creators involved than the business of the Big Tent crossover itself can be seen in (9) Kieron Gillen's work on the Journey Into Mystery issues associated with Fear Itself. Assisted by a series of artists who, to a lesser or greater degree, helped him bring his end of the playing field to life, Gillen succeeded in focusing on the nuts'n'bolts of his craft rather than upon the post-modern - or should that just be sloppy and self-indulgent - spectacularisms of the 21st century comic book. To praise a creator for attending to the basics is no backhanded compliment. Just as it is a revolutionary act in dishonest times to tell the truth, so it's undeniably a radical business in a decadent creative milieu to reject the easy shortcuts and the money-spinning wankerisms in order to attend to the logic of plot, the essence of character, and to the framing of events so that they reflect ethical as well as dramatic priorities. It was an achievement on Gillen's part which left his work seeming as untypical and enjoyable as an unexpectedly fine three-part harmony at a drunken karaoke marathon, and it can be best experienced in the story illustrated by Richard Elson in JIM # 630. There the easy opportunities for a maudlin post-Event recap were rejected in favour of recasting Volstagg the Voluminous as an existential hero, redefining himself over and over again as one of a series of quite distinct and often unexpected roles in order to better serve the needs of those around him. Touching, telling, and smart, it stands as something of a corrective to all of those who regard the Event as an excuse to string a couple of empty-headed and supposedly-shocking plot twists together via a string of talking heads and pin-up pages.
A similarly elegant, exciting and unsentimentally heart-tugging achievement can be found in (10) Al Ewing and Leigh Gallagher's Judge Dredd: The Family Man. I simply can't think of another story, in this or any other year, which so clearly and concisely weaves such a thoughtful and suspenseful tale out of so much ambition and continuity. Where most other writers attempting such a task would find themselves mired in a plot-slowing mass of exposition, or avoiding the whole business and producing the most confusing of tales, Ewing once more shows how he's one of the very finest writers working in comics today. Even the oddness of the combination of genre-forms that Ewing puts to work in The Family Man go unnoticed as the story progresses, for the unravelling of the plot is so effectively achieved that the events on the page never appear to be anything other than fully integrated and entirely involving.
The very idea of a two-part story featuring a dystopian SF western
crossed with an espionage thriller is surely challenging enough. Yet Ewing uses that hybrid of forms to carry a tragedy despairing of the right's unraveling of the state's responsibilities to the more helpless of its citizens. To do so while using so much of Dredd's backstory, from the Cursed Earth mutant settlements to an apparently long-unmentioned secret organisation in the Justice Department itself, merely shows how little ambition the typical Event book is marked by. For there's far, far more going on, and a great more being achieved, in this single tale than tends to be shown in any half-a-dozen crossover books. Without the slightest narrative drag caused by all the continuity, and without any trace of worthiness coming across from the political sub-text, The Family Man functions as if it were the most transparent of comicbook tales. But then, that's exactly what it is. Ewing's script, in combination with the impressive precision and admirable restraint of Gallagher's artwork, seamlessly fuses all of the story's components together into a deceptively straight-forward and engaging narrative. No other story this year transmitted the feeling of helplessness than might be felt by those trying to find a safe place of shelter on the periphery of events, and there was certainly no more quietly chilling portrayal of political evil than that carried in The Family Man's closing face-off between Dredd and the sublimely reprehensible Judge Bachman.
There's nothing wrong with the mainstream Event that a reduction of the hype and micro-management matched with an increased measure of craft, skill and ambition on the part of creators can't put right.
TooBusyThinking Offers Its Sincere Thanks To The Following Creators For Their Having Made 2011 A Better Place To Live In;
in no order of preference, since all involved are entirely splendid;
(1) Robbie Morrison & Simon Fraser for Nikolai Dante: Bad Blood (2000ad # 1732-1736)
(2) Roger Langride & Chris Samnee for Thor The Mighty Avenger
(3) Rob Williams & D'Israeli for Low Life: The Deal (2000ad #1750-1761)
(4) Damon Lindelof & Ryan Sook for Life Support (Action Comics # 900)
(5) Mark Waid, Paolo Rivera & Marcos Martin for Daredevil
(6) Paul Cornell & Jimmy Broxton for Knight And Squire
(7) Gail Simone, Jim Calafiore & Marcos Marz for Secret Six
(8) Kieron Gillen & Jamie McKelvie for Generation Hope # 9
(9) Kieron Gillen & Richard Elson's Journey Into Mystery # 630
(10) Al Ewing & Leigh Gallagher for Judge Dredd:The Family Man (Judge Dredd Megazine # 312/3)
Numbers 11 onwards are, of course, still to come, as well as the last 3 - boo-hiss - problems ...
A Brief Recap Of What's Going On Here
If you've not read either of the first two parts of this piece - and why should you? - then here's a quick recap of how this
best-and-worst-of-2011 has been put together;
"I've tried to make what follows a relatively brief summary of a year's
worth of blogging. There's 8 sections to come, each of which in turn
deals with a series of problems which seem to be commonly afflicting
most of today's comics. At the end of each section, I've mentioned one
or more of my favourite comics from the past twelve months, each a
notable and much-appreciated exception to whatever rule it is that I'm
trying to establish. Most of the comics which I mention favourably could
have been used to contradict any of the general criticisms I've made,
and I've shared them around more with a desire to break up the moaning
than to suggest that each of them is characterised by just a single and
specific virtue. Nothing could be further from my mind."
.
.











Thinking about the new 52, you are on to something when you note that the relaunch wasn't necessary. The characters from Demon Knights could have existed in the past, or have been magically transported there. Dick Grayson could have gone back to being Nightwing in-story. Resurrection Man could rise again and OMAC 2.0 did not need any sort of relaunch to reemerge, Wonder Woman could have dedicated herself to a new mission, Sinestro could go back to being a GL, etc. Contrast the situation with the post.Crisis reboot (no Superboy or Supergirl, new beginning for Wonder Woman, new continuity for Hawkman) and the restarted-but-not-really NewDC seems even more pointless.
ReplyDeleteThen again, would we have really cared if a batch of new DCs came out if there hadn't been this relaunch? In a way, it's the most successful event of the new era we're trying to half-ignore. I doubt Animal Man or Demon Knights would have sold as much without the relaunch. I give DC credit for making something out of nothing, as new story arcs, miniseries, and ongoings are released all the time without half the attention. You're right to say the relaunch was driven by profit more than creative concerns, and bungled in many ways, but it got butts in seats. I'm curious as to whether people stay for the whole movie and return for the sequels, however.
I just tried to preview a comment, but it got swallowed. If you find something with no name attached, it was from me. I wrote about the New 52. No big deal if you can't find it, but I'm giving you the heads up anyway in case the comment appears.
ReplyDelete- Mike Loughlin
Hello Mike:- Thank you for the note explaining what's going on. There's apparently been some trouble with folks commenting in the past few days anyway. I appreciate you persevering, it's always good to chat to you.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with you that the New 52 has in many ways been a success. My feeling is that it just hasn't been the success that it might have been. Sales are up, and up by a considerable degree; that's great. And there are good books, without doubt. I don't want to suggest there aren't. Yet my feeling is that there were other priorities which haven't been attented too, and that what was dumped was far too precious just to wipe off of the board. Until comics start attending to the matter of bangs-for-your-bucks, and until creators start telling stories that are as dense as they're transparent and so on, the superhero book will remain inprecarious health. Worse yet, they'll be perpetually underachieving. I know many if not most folks might disagree with me, but I think the New 52 dealt far more with surface with substance. A revolution was needed, yes. And this one has claimed back some lost territory. But there were other ways to achieve the goal.
I do suspect that the huge budget associated with the reboot could've been used to float the old universe and revolutionise the standard of storytelling. That would've been far more challenging - and the New 52 must have been challenging enough - but far more of a longterm bet. Who knows? At the moment, the New 52 is doing very well and I'm another couch critic. Yet I do think that the issue isn't either "DC screwed uo" or "Hurrah for DC". The company did well, there are good books out there, and the momentum appears to have been established.
But too much of the storytelling is still commonly poor and too many of the issues dysfunctionally thin. And the universe itself seems no better - to say the least - than what had gone before. And of course the Ultimate Universe effect is going to hit very soon, as the New DC starts to generate its own continuity.
As you are, I'm curious if folks stay for the whole movie, and if they pay attention to most of what appears on the screen. I'm certainly not suggesting that the project has failed. It could go from strength to strength, and I'm not going to moan about a healthy industry and more and more good comics.
But if ruled the world, not only would every day NOT be the first day of Spring, but I'd get that storytelling in The Big Two's comics sorted out pronto.
I hope Sunday is proving a fine place to visit, Mike. Have a good evening.
Colin, you are absolutely correct in stating that the new 52 from DC could simply have just continued from their regular books. I adore Action Comics, with the young and wet-behind-the-ears Superman, but that could have been a 12 part mini-series, much in the way that All-Star Superman was, for example.
ReplyDeleteI like my continuity. I have spent a considerable amount of money, time and effort in becoming cognizant with that continuity. It makes me...cranky to have it all thrown out of the window.
How on earth do the poor writers like having to always subvert their ideas for the book, in order to conform to the Great Cross-Overs? It's getting to the point where having any story that is NOT a cross-over is a huge deal. Which is a little silly when one stops and actually thinks about it. I don't mind having events in other books be commented on, or have ramifications, but I want to have stories about Thor. Just Thor. Or just Spider-Man. Or just Green Lantern or Superman. For a change. If you want multi-superheroes...well, that's what the Justice League or the Avengers was for.
But oh, Journey Into Mystery has indeed been stellar.
Hello Sally:- I always enjoyed the fact that you express a love for the backstory of, for example, the GLC on GLBF. Reading your words reminded me that your blog was on a list of blogosphere destinations to visit that I had when I was still a teacher and needed a break during the first few minutes of a free period and the like. And I share your fondness for the richness and potential of continuity. It takes a bright and disciplined writer to use all that potential in a way that helps a story rather than swamps it, but there are plenty of creators around who've been good at that. Secret Six is an example of that, and one I know we both loved. And I'm just watching some recent Dr Who episodes again as I blog, and that's a fine example of how continuity can help rather than hinders a prperty.It's not that I'm against the re-boot as a concept; it's just that you have to something considerably better than what gets discarded. As DC seems not have learned with the poor Legion Of Super Heroes; the more you dump the past, the weaker a property tends to become. It's not always true, but it does tend to be. I know all about the fact that the Silver Age saw the Golden Age properties rebooted. But it simply wasn't a comparable situation; there was no continuity as such being dumped in doing so, for one thing.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea how writers cope with the degree of direction they're subject to. I'm sure they're mature adults who understand that their employers are employing them as team players. But I can think of few great comics which have produced by such a system.
It's quite wonderful that, for example, the likes of Ewing's Dredd and Gillen's Journey Into Mystery can stand out as individual examples of work despite the grand continuity that their subject matter is situated within. But there are few folks who seem to be able to deliever a story which is, as you say, just Spider-Man, or whatever. The New DC has promised us something of this, yet many of the franchises already seem to be mostly anything but. Time will tell, I know ...
Sooner or later, the industry is going to have to reach out beyond the niche which is willing to buy into the great ongoing soap-operas of the immersive universes. I know it's regarded as at best niavity, and at worst heresy, but I still believe that a tradition of really strong stories is the best way to reach out beyond the niche to a broader audience. And I speak as a bloke who's wife - no comic book reader at all - has picked up Knight & Squire by chance and loved it. If there were more comics that fine, I'd have no problem feeding her curiosity ...
re SallyP: Paul Cornell, to my infinite sadness, said about Captain Britain that he wishes he could've been in an event all the time. Because then, the sales would've stayed up and he could've kept writing them.
ReplyDelete- Charles RB
I find it particularly heartening to see younger writers like Al Ewing and Michael Carroll come in on Dredd, and there is no real drop in quality between the obviously brilliant John Wagner stories.
ReplyDeleteCarroll's Day of Chaos interlude in prog 1752 might be my favourite Dredd story of the year, (closely followed by the ongoing misadventures of PJ Maybe), with that lovely moment when Dredd admits that he finds comfort in the younger generation coming through and building on the good work he has done.
It was an extremely satisfying six pages, so much so that I just assumed it was a Wagner story, and I was genuinely surprised to go back and see Caroll's name in the credit box.
I can think of no greater compliment, than to say I thought it was a John Wagner Dredd.
Hello Charles:- Ah, talking about the much-missed Captain's last book does bring a touch of fan-sadness, doesn't it? Paul Cornell is one of a handful of writers I'd trust to produce a comic that I'd want to read that was caught up in an Event, though there's so many variables at play in any situation that I know nobody's certain to pull off a triumph in a crossover. All of the finest creators seem to do far more than just grasp that an event book actually has to be in some ways better than one that doesn't line-up in a broader continuity. Too often the tie-in book reads as if it thinks it exists in the context of a huge story which largely exists elsewhere, whereas the truth is that event issue needs to turn in a double duty; excellent in itself AND excellent in what it offers the crossover. There are relatively few fine Event crossovers which can be held up as exemplars in the years since the 85/6 Crisis, but those few which can - as you yourself have argued, of course :) - are things of wonder.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy reading how an able creator squares the circle of the Event. But the mass of such books seem to aim for little beyond ticking a couple of boxes on a plot-list before passing the responsibility onto others. Of course, we hear quietly of creators working under tremendous pressure and impossible deadlines in many Events, so I don't mean, in the end, to seem to blame anybody but the publishers and their editorial mandates.
Hello Bob:- I must say, I'm becoming more and more heartened where the future of 2000ad is concerned. Your points about Dredd being safe in the hands of folks other than Mr Wagner are well made, although, if I may be heretical, I currently find myself enjoying Mr Ewing's Dredd more than anyone's else's. To state a preference for any one take on a franchise character isn't to mean to damn anyone else; Mr Wagner is obviously one of THE finest comics writers there's been. His Strontium Dog series last year was a thing of utter joy, and - wonder of wonders - it's back in the X-Mas prog. Yet I really am burned out on P J Maybe, and for all that I admire the craft in those tales, there's a sense that the character just isn't strong enough to carry that much panel-time. I have a horrible sense that I'll find I've been quite wrong when I re-read the year's stories over a hopefully piggly and sleepy Christmas, mind you ...
ReplyDeleteI can absolutely see why you, or indeed anyone else, would enjoy Mr Caroll's work in # 1752. But surely that *!£$* that Dredd runs into during the Justice Department's own parent's evening - how I used to hate them! - deserved more than 6 months for the abandonment of his kid and his failure to pay maintenance. I'd've sent him off to Titan, and I think that's an absolutely objective assessment. Oh, yes ....
Come to think of it, how is that Mega-City lost sight of that guy for so long? There's surely charges of system fraud to go along with a lack of financial support for the nipper? Titan, I tell you, Titan!
Colin - Alcalas's work was...phenomenal, not just on Conan but all those old Marvel Horror comics and Swamp Thing, too. But...
ReplyDeleteI absolutely loved Ernie Chan's inks on Buscema's pencils. In fact, I preferred Chan's Conan to Buscema's! I never understood why Chan wasn't given more opportunities to draw Conan (though he did do the Conan weekly newspaper strip). Not sure if you recall it, because it only ran for 6 issues, but Caw the Conqueror was DC's Conan ripoff - Claw looked exactly like Conan in fact, but Ernie Chan wrote and drew the comic. It was pure pulp S&S without the Conan name-power, but it's a delight to see Chan's work front and center. I consider it an alterna-Conan!
I think ElfQuest once had the rights picked up for a film production...I loved ElfQuest and all the elf series that followed, ha ha. ElfLord, Poison Elves, Elf Warrior, Troll Lords - good stuff!!! Most of my collection consists of S&S (of varying quality) and fantasy comics; if you'd like I can compile a list of titles for you when I've got the chance.
Oh, and btw, did you know a Conan-Groo crossover is in the offing?
Hello Matthew:- No problem with where the comment arrives. My apologies for being late with responding.
ReplyDeleteIt's always grand to meet somebody else who realises how wonderful Alcala's work was. I agree with every example you suggest, and suggest his beautiful Ka-Zar inks and - my favourite - the Captain Marvel issue he both drew and inked. Wonderful work.
Ernie Chan I was less of a fan of, in that his work often seemed less detailed than it might. But I readily concede that his work was pleasing and in particular always captured a sense of motion. Everything was always moving in his panels, or just about to.
Claw? Of course I remember Claw! I bought everything that I could in the mid-Seventies and anything with 'Marvel' or 'DC' came first. So, Claw, Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser - in Wonder Woman first, rather unbelievably - Stalker ... And then the likes of Iron-Jaw - now there's a concept - and Wulf from Atlas. An astonishing burst of mud against the wall with so little sticking, and yet I'm still fond of it all. You're right that Claw was one of the best of the bunch. Did you ever catch his appearances about 2 decades later in Primal Force, or Stalker's as a big big baddie in JSA?
Elfquest was constantly ALMOST being made, if memory serves me right. A real shame, because if ever there was a breakout property for the time, then that was it. That it's fallen so far from the attention of the comics scene is a real shame.
You've inspired me to take a look at writing a touch about this topic. Perhaps I might get in touch for a top ten or the like? Twould be a nice touch.
A Conan-Groo team-up? How splendid. Mind you, it's going to take a remarkably good creative team to pull that off.
"Ewing once more shows how he's one of the very finest writers working in comics today."
ReplyDeleteFor God's sake man, keep it down!! If them 'Mericans get a sniff of him it is game over. His taking over Jennifer Blood from Garth Ennis was a bad sign, and I'm sure this won't help!!!!
Granted it is only a matter of time before he and Tiernen Trevallion get kidnapped by the Yanks (have you seen Double T's Feast of Toys? I'm sure I must have banged on about it before), but if we can get another few months of work out of them first it'd be worth it. ;)
Hello Emperor:- I can't help it! It's ridiculous that Al Ewing isn't a line-leading writer across the pond. My blog sadly hasn't the influence to get me the sponsorship for a new ink cartridge, so don't get me wrong, I'm not so twisted by blogging that I think I can make the slightest difference. But f'heavens sake, he's a real writer, if we read "read" to mean the likes of Gerber and Wagner and Eisner, the type of writer that makes you really glad about the whole business of comics.
ReplyDeleteI didn't know of Feast Of Toys,and I should have, since I follow Bad Librarianship. It's great stuff, reminiscent of Mike McMahon in certain ways while having a character all of its own. Is there higher praise? Not from here-abouts.
Thanks for the heads-up.