In the first issue of 1941's All Winners Comics, Joe Simon and Jack Kirby's Captain America and Bucky fought to destroy an army of tramps-turned-zombies who were sabotaging the soon-to-be Allied war effort on the orders of Hitler himself! Something of what made that story so radical and entertaining is the topic of this week's post in The Year In Comic series over at Sequart, which I hope you might choose to visit by clicking here.
What follows below was originally part of that week's essay. Eventually it became obvious that I'd actually written two separate posts, one of which discussed the progressive nature of those early Captain American tales in general and one which briefly discussed Simon and Kirby's storytelling in the context of 1941. The following is the latter piece, which tries to show just a little of how far ahead of their fellow creators Simon and Kirby were in 1941 when it came to creating utterly unputdownable superhero stories.
I wonder if we can ever imagine quite what a rush it must have been for a kid in the late spring of 1941 to be faced with the Timely Comics' anthology title All Winner Comics #1. The shock of the new, or at least the comparatively new, is always well-nigh impossible to convincingly, let alone accurately, evoke. Yet I do find it impossible not to wonder what was it like to come across one of Simon and Kirby's game-changing Captain America tales in the first issue of All Winners, sandwiched as it was in between far more familiar and less radical fare? For though it's not as if several of the comic's other features weren't compelling in their own right, it is that Simon and Kirby's work was considerably more dynamic and innovative than that of any other super-book creators of the time. For another writer or artist to have their work placed either side of one of those barnstorming early Captain American tales was for them to be faced with the inevitability of playing support act and second-fiddle to Joe and Jack's storytelling. For Simon and Kirby had transformed the form and content of the super-hero sub-genre with the arrival of Captain America Comics in December 1940, and they'd shown no signs of intending to slacken off the ambition and vitality of their work as the following year progressed.
![]() |
| A typical page from Carl Burgos' luridly titled Human Torch tale, "Carnival Of Fiends" |
The opening feature in All Winners Comics #1 was Carnival of Fiends – Carnival Of Fiends! - a Carl Burgos Human Torch & Toro short featuring several nefarious Japanese super-spies operating under the cover of a community of loyal-to-the-Republic Chinese-Americans. It’s predictably slight but exuberant, and that's in spite of its barely perfunctory art and a plot that’s not even that. The page designs often involve little more than one three-row, nine-panel composition after another, with the occasional merging of frames in order to emphasise the drama of the moment. Sometimes a hand or elbow or foot, flaming or not, will poke tentatively rather than energetically beyond a panel's border, and there'll be an infrequent and arbitrarily circular frame thrown in now and then just for the monotony-relieving hell of it all. Improvisation arrives without too much purpose, simplicity marks the storytelling for want of any other option, and yet it's all crammed with movement and incident and loaded up with cliffhangers. Secret codes! Gas attacks! Firework displays! Television screens! Flaming super-heroes! Fifth columnists! Hidden passages! Fiendishly hypnotised super-androids! Crude it undoubtedly is, but then, that's part of why it's so compelling. It crackles with conviction and commitment, like a two-chord garage band nuking a Sunday morning’s peace with endless run-throughs of the same Nuggets knock-offs.
The pace then plummets with the arrival of The Order Of The Hood, a tale of the Black Marvel produced by writer Stan Lee and artists Al Avision
and Al Gabriele. With his unfortunate habit of packing less incident-crammed panels onto each page of his story than Burgos, Lee allows scenes to sprawl
across several sides without anything that’s ingenious, energetic or gruesome
enough being injected into the mix to charge up the rubes. Sinfully, more than a page is given over to the action-free, ennui-inspiring sight of the Black Marvel being led without struggling to a "Ray Machine", while the dullest of master-villains rambles on about how he intends to be ever more masterful and villainous in the future. Lee tries to inject wisecracks in place of incident and speechifying in place of spectacle, but that just adds stodge to tedium. Even worse than
primitive, the art’s relatively polite. Too vaguely competent and sedate to be adult-baitingly perverse, too lacking in invention to be anything other than a great flat, characterless mish-mash of more of the same, Avision and Gabriele's art compliments Lee's adventure-light plot to create tensionless, interest-free panels.
But what did the reader think and feel who then turned the side and came page-to-face with
The Case Of The Hollow Men? Unlike the opening salvos of the preceding Human Torch and Black Marvel tales, Simon and Kirby took the whole of their first page to trail the pop-pulp horrors that were to come. Even today, it’s a splash that doesn’t so much demand the reader’s
attention so much as stab fish-hooks in their eyes in order to tug them too and fro across the artwork. Enter the page at the top left and there’s a fanged, cowled ne’er-do-well with his sinister, leering head tilted to direct the audience's gaze towards the four-storey tall zombie.You might think that we'd need no encouragement to notice that undead behemoth pierced through as he is with two longer-than-a-grown-man swords. But Simon and Kirby weren't taking any chances where a square half-inch or two of dead space at the top of the side was concerned. Then, follow the direction of the zuvembie's lurching progress and there’s the pitiful sight of a cowering Bucky Barnes, made all the more vulnerable by his lack of either a mask or any cover to hide behind. But even that’s not nearly even action and jeopardy! For tearing in from the right-hand edge of the page is the
Sentinel Of Liberty himself, as yet unnoticed by his opponent, but caught for us just
about a nano-second before he tightens his hands around a dead-skinned, over-sized neck. The design hauls the eye backwards and forwards across the page until the art seems dizzy with movement, and yet that's only the top of the page accounted for.
Cap's leap leads us to focus next on the monster's almost-parallel right and then left arms beneath him. It's a process which in its turn directs us downwards past the series of protruding sword points and hilts, beyond the flailing washing line and the undead man's own extended right leg, before finally arriving at a scene in which a spattering of doughty but helpless cops are attempting to shot down the already unliving zombie. Here the dead-bum's body serves as a spine upon which a series of eye-directing horizontal design-elements can be hung, carrying us down from one aspect of the conflict to another. Even then, the reader's not allowed to catch their breath, for before the page can be turned, there's hype to be consumed. First, the sight of the patrolman who's being crushed beneath a giant fence-shattering boot carries us away from the page-leaving edge into the text caption. Then, via the detail of a poor tumbling alley-cat, we're pushed towards the title-line at the page's base. Only when we've doubled back on ourselves and arrived at the final star-spangled "A" of the good Captain's name do Simon and Kirby relent and allow us to move onwards and over the page.
Cap's leap leads us to focus next on the monster's almost-parallel right and then left arms beneath him. It's a process which in its turn directs us downwards past the series of protruding sword points and hilts, beyond the flailing washing line and the undead man's own extended right leg, before finally arriving at a scene in which a spattering of doughty but helpless cops are attempting to shot down the already unliving zombie. Here the dead-bum's body serves as a spine upon which a series of eye-directing horizontal design-elements can be hung, carrying us down from one aspect of the conflict to another. Even then, the reader's not allowed to catch their breath, for before the page can be turned, there's hype to be consumed. First, the sight of the patrolman who's being crushed beneath a giant fence-shattering boot carries us away from the page-leaving edge into the text caption. Then, via the detail of a poor tumbling alley-cat, we're pushed towards the title-line at the page's base. Only when we've doubled back on ourselves and arrived at the final star-spangled "A" of the good Captain's name do Simon and Kirby relent and allow us to move onwards and over the page.
And that's just one aspect of how far ahead Simon and Kirby were in the day. Simply through the apparently hectic and yet skillfully organised elements of their page-designs, they created a sense of frantic momentum and densely-packed incident which none of their colleagues and competitors could begin to match. (It might be argued that few today could do so either.) Yes, to step back from this first page of The Case Of The Hollow Men is to notice how technically suspect the composition is when considered as a whole. The figure of Bucky seems to be lifted from another source entirely, for example, and the building he's standing upon is an unconvincing confection of a prop. In fact, the more the reader stares, the more the different elements of the composition seem to come from quite separate sources. Yet Simon and Kirby's skill lay how their work convinced the audience to read and enjoy each parts of the work in sequence. As such, of course, the reader isn't concerned with, for instance, whether the perspective of it all is convincing. Who could possibly care about the degree to which the symbolic and the pseudo-realistic aspects of the page have been convincingly combined, when there's that impossibly massive sword-cushion of a zombie lurching in the direction of Captain America's sidekick, and when that poor cat might be about to be crushed to death?
Ensuring that the reader's utterly captured by the events before them while also guaranteeing that they feel irresistibly compelled to read on was all that mattered here. In many ways, it's all that matters now. And regardless of how impossible it might be to re-capture what the audience of children who consumed the likes of All Winners Comics #1 in 1941 actually experienced, it's close to impossible to believe that they didn't practically rip this page from the comic in order to discover what was going to happen next.
"The Year In Comics" features a discussion of other aspects of Simon and Kirby's zombie-fighting Captain America tale here.
.
Ensuring that the reader's utterly captured by the events before them while also guaranteeing that they feel irresistibly compelled to read on was all that mattered here. In many ways, it's all that matters now. And regardless of how impossible it might be to re-capture what the audience of children who consumed the likes of All Winners Comics #1 in 1941 actually experienced, it's close to impossible to believe that they didn't practically rip this page from the comic in order to discover what was going to happen next.
"The Year In Comics" features a discussion of other aspects of Simon and Kirby's zombie-fighting Captain America tale here.
.








Awesome! Has this been collected anywhere?
ReplyDeleteWhat's your opinion on Marvel's GA books? I've heard good stuff about Sub-Mariner and The Human Torch.
Hello CJ:- I have discovered in the past week, while paying attention to The Case Of The Hollow Men, that it is indeed awesome. As I argue over at Sequart, it's punk rock in comic book form, and all the better for it.
DeleteAs far as I know, the story has only been reprinted twice. Once in something called Captain America Collectors’ Preview #1 from 1995, which can be had for around £10 including p & p on E-Bay - and which I've never seen, so the info may not be correct! - and once in Marvel Masterworks All Winners volume 1.
I can't say I've read enough of the Marvel/Timely Golden Age material to have anything of a trustworthy opinion. The Simon and Kirby Cap stuff is by far the best that I've come across. Much of what I've read beyond thatis, with notable exceptions, rather rough and ready. Bill Everett's Sub-Mariner tales are always worth the price of entry, and I very much enjoyed the two post-war issues of All-Winners Squad which have Cap, the Torch and Subby teamed up with the Whizzer and Miss America in a Marvel take on the JSA. (But I read them in a Fantasy Masterworks reprint when I was a boy, so nostalgia may be operating there!) Beyond that, I'm still learning as I go. Much of what I've read comes from the company's first few years. You know, there could be a Golden Age going on in the comics from the mid-40s from Timely, but I'd not know about it.
Mea culpa :)
Colin, I can confirm the Captain America Collector's Preview reprint; the Collector's Preview had an extensive interview with Joe Simon (he also drew the cover with John Byrne) and the Hollow Men story was offered as an example of a "rare" Simon/Kirby offering, presented for the first time on glossy paper with modern colouring.
DeleteIt was also reprinted in the Golden Age of Marvel Vol.2 TPB.
As you say Colin, it's simply wonderful, easily one of the best Simon/Kirby Captain America tales.
I should mention I just received & read a copy of the Simon/Kirby Boys' Ranch hardcover; I tracked it down in the used book market after your compelling Sequart article. The whole volume was an interesting piece of universe-building and fusion of Simon/Kirby's kid gang stories with the western genre. I might write up a review, it's sparked a few ideas about how Kirby tackled westerns.
Hello Michael:- I would love to read a post on Boys' Ranch by your good self. You know FAR more than I do where the comic books of the period - and quite probably any and all periods :) - are concerned. If I can enjoy reading about obscure 60's Shadow books on your blog, then I can anticipate turning up to read about BR and Kirby's westerns in general with a considerable measure of enthusiasm.
DeleteAnd the more that's written about Boys Ranch, the less we might eventually hear from the "Kirby-couldn't-write" brigade, who so often base their arguments on the post-Marvel '69 period and seem to know nothing about the pre-Marvel period at all.
Which is not to say that Kirby's work since he left Marvel at the end of the 60s can't be regarded as containing some highly effective and often moving work. ('Himon' alone would destroy that argument.) But Boys Ranch, for example, seems to me to close any argument about JK's writing.
(And thanks for visiting the piece over at Sequart too. You're an egg!)
Thank you for the information about the other appearance of the Cap/zombie tale. You see, you are the Man Who Knows. Boy, but those two volumes are going for a packet over this side of the pond. Still, I did just find a cheap copy of the first one after digging around following reading your comment. And by the looks of the contents, I should enjoy it!
I'll make you a deal: I'll review Boys' Ranch if you correct "Jack Birby" in the tags on this post. :-)
DeleteI'm glad to hear you're enjoying Bitter Fruit!
I certainly never doubted Kirby's ability to write (Eternals#13 is one of my all-time favourites); I will, however, contest it so far as his dialogue goes. The bombastic dialogue suits some of his comics, but not all of them. Fortunately, bombast was in short supply on Boys' Ranch. Even then, I love his Black Panther, ridiculous bombast and all; it's not Don McGregor, but why should it have been?
You wondered above about 1940s Timely titles; Simon, Kirby & Everett are definitely worth your time, regardless of the strip (Golden Age of Marvel presents a few of their better obscure series: Tuk, Caveboy & the Fin). Beyond that, the Black Widow, Thin Man & Blue Blaze stories are sufficiently weird enough to seek out. I also think you might enjoy Miss America. Because Roy Thomas defined her in the Bronze Age as the Whizzer's significant other, I doubt many who know of her think too much about her. Within her actual 1940s appearances, though, she's quite something - a female hero who shows as much skin as Superman, only rarely has a love interest (only in the multi-part Miss America mini-epic, IIRC) and is simply one tough patriotic woman. She was no Wonder Woman, but definitely a strong 40s heroine.
Hello Michael:- Ah, poor Jack Birby. Despite his many contributions to the history of comics, the very mention of him inevitably inspires cries of "typo! typo!". He couldn't be vulnerable to historical revisionism if I had actually made him up. Or chanced upon his name through creative typing ...
DeleteI would agree with you entirely about the worst of Kirby's work. Yet what's strange is how often, even in the later books, he manages to make that post-Marvel bombast - to lift your term - work. I'll happily take the Fourth World, Kamandi, Black Panther, OMAC, The Eternals, and The Demon from the post-Lee work. I'd also bus in issues and elements of issues from Machine Man, Devil Dinosaur and Captain Victory too. And I'm willing to bet that I've forgotten comics from that period too. Oh, Destroyer Duck with Gerber! And, and ...
Your advice about Timely comics to investigate is much appreciated. I've been fond of Thin Man since Liberty Legion, and Miss America seems very interesting indeed. Thank you for taking the time to do that. It's much appreciated.
But what of poor Jack Birby? Who will remember his achievements?
That's a Captain America comic?! MADRE GRUD!
ReplyDeleteIt's impossible to imagine something like this now. Not just an outright, unambigious stance on a specific foreign policy*; not just the fact it's drokking zombies and particularly gruesome, pulpy ones, that are tied into the stance and targeting specific people; not just the fact Cap is hanging out with homeless people and this isn't a 'thing'; there's also Cap's secret identity as a minor soldier that's considered a bit rubbish, and the fact that Cap is just a superhero here instead of an awesome legend.
This could not happen now. The threat wouldn't be considered a Cap one. Nobody would dare give him a stance on, say, Afghanistan, because that would cause offence. Nobody would have a blunt portrayal of the underclass as a thing that just exists. And certainly, nobody would have Cap as just some dude. The legend has set in too much.
- Charles RB
Hello Charles:- It's a Captain America which I can certainly get behind! And I'm with you all the way on the virtues of this version of the character, from the explicit politics - land-lease/anti-fascism - to the proletarian bias of the script. Cap and Bucky's familiarity with the Bowery and their refusal to think less of the folks who fate has brought there is one of those what's-gone-wrong-with-the-superbook moments. What have we spent the last 70 years doing? I know, I know, there's been thousands of good books, and yet look at today's books and you'll see little of the spirit and exhuberance of The Case Of The Hollow Men.
DeleteThe more I look, the more I do think I'm looking at one of the greatest super-books ever.It does have the rush of a great playful, loud, committed punk record. Of course, folks such as Michael - above - have known this for a long time, but I'm still learning, whether it's about The Dandy in 2012 or Captain America in 1941.
I very much take your point about why a great many aspects of this version of Cap wouldn't be acceptable today. A shame. I'm tired of the King-of-the-world Cap. I'm certainly weary of his stupidity and unpleasantness. But the Cap who gives his spare change to a panhandler AND allows him to get the last word; that's a Cap I could get behind, as the Steve Rogers of the Cap movie was.
And them zombies are brilliant, aren't they? Even today, they'd be a talking point!
The storytelling techniques here are so radically different from what we commonly see now, it's shocking. The stylization, the compression, the willingness to bend reality for storytelling purposes, all of it. This is comics as descended from comic strips, not from movies. They're more aware of the value of page space -- and less aware of the value of verisimilitude in dramatic moments.
ReplyDelete(Yeah, that's right, I said it: modern styles have their advantages. Modern comic art styles are capable of things old-tymey art styles weren't. Styles by definition mean making choices, and that means doing some things not as well as others. A noncontroversial point, but I feel weirdly defensive in making it.)
There's a fine quote in a recent article at the blog Savage Critics: "everybody quit vamping, learn how to cut from panel to panel, old comics had reasons for putting a lot of narration or expository dialogue, and you not knowing or acknowledging what they were doing makes you ignorant, not sophisticated, i read manga you’re not manga." Exactly. Exactly.
"The Case of the Hollow Men" is a strange beast if viewed through the modern lens of "comics as storyboards with staples." Events compress in single panels that make no sense; stylization is extreme; the splash page is an abstraction of the story as a whole. This approach, "comics as comics," can work wonders.
(Also: when an army of chalk-white zombies attacks a group of soldiers, that the soldiers think "saboteur!" rather than "zombie!" is hilarious and odd, isn't it? Weirder still -- the soldiers were right. WEEEEEIRD.)
Hello Harvey:- You're absolutely right! It is SHOCKING work. I'm familiar with the S + K tales from the Captain America book itself, but the All-Winners tales were strangers to me. Coming across The Case Of The Hollow Men really was just like hearing The Ramones for the first time. I'd add the influence of movies to that of the comic strip, neither of which I threw into my piece over at Sequart, to my shame, but there's so much going into the brew and being fused into a new form, isn't there?
DeleteI certainly wouldn't argue with you about modern styles being capable of so much that the 1-2-3-4! of 1941 S +K wasn't. And of course, S + K's work soon pulled away from the runaway directness of what was in this story. I hope I didn't suggest that THIS was the only way to produce a superhero tale. But the absence of politeness and pretension that's on display here, the dynamism, the proletarian attitude, the pop culture ambition; it's a damn shame to see so little of it today.
That's a great link. Mr Khosla is ALWAYS worth reading. And as someone who's been won over by Saga - and who has a very positive review of the book scheduled to appear next month elsewhere - I find myself nodding along with much that he's saying, including the self-confessed contradictions.
You're right to note how odd TCOTHM can seem if it's viewed through the prism of today's methods. That was one reason why I was struggling with that most impossible thing to describe, namely the way in which the gaze is directed across a page. And yet, that's certainly one skill which so many modern super-book creators have lost. All that static posing, all that buy-it-on-the-secondary-market detail; but the purposeful energy of S + K is almost entirely missing.
You always notice things I miss! I hadn't realised how absurd that "saboteur!" line is. Perhaps Earth-Timely had seen so many monsterous Nazi Fifth Column attacks that the sight of anything which seemed to come from a B-Movie was assummed to an unwelcome visit from the Axis?
No? Well, it doesn't matter, does it? It doesn't have to make sense to be damn cool!
Another Thing That Is Cool: in the "Black Marvel" story page you posted, which is indeed bad, one great thing sticks out.
ReplyDeleteCheck the head in the bottom left of panel two. It's not only disconnected from a body of any sort -- you should be able to catch at least a hint of shoulder, based on perspective, so we're looking at a floating disembodied head -- it's also the only figure on the page to break panel borders, and it has the craziest look in its eyes. It looks like a sticker of "Insane Evil Monk's Head" was slapped onto the page by a six year old child. Which is awesome.
Someone with image manipulation skills needs to pull that head out of the page and employ it for nefarious purposes throughout the internet. Preferably with the caption "HEY LADIES" on it or something of that ilk.
The page has a little historical value, too, in that it contains a very early Stan Lee Villain Monologue. By the sixties, he was the absolute master of that genre; nobody wrote grandiose threats by world-conquering madmen like Lee. Here he's just learning how to get the requisite menace and pomposity into the speech. Still very "Republic Movie Serial Villain," but the seeds are there. Damn, I love a good pompous Villain Monologue. One of the great pleasures of the superhero book.
"My genius is supreme! Richards will die! I AM DOOOOOOM!" See, it feels good just to type that.
Hello Harvey:- It is indeed a splendidly disconnected and expressive face, isn't it? Clearly the product, as was Black Marvel itself, of an artistic team that really didn't know what they were doing. That few people did in the say would be a fair point, but there was, to name but a few, Simon and Kirby, Eisner, Lou Fine and Jack Cole who were to a greater or lesser degree beginning to bring the future in existence. Still, that lack of chops has indeed left us with Insane Evil Monk's Head, who I'd like to believe then popped up at random in just about every Golden Age comic ever printed. (I'd also like to believe that the CCA had a specific provision banning the Head from ever appearing again.)
DeleteI was deeply tempted to go off at a tangent about the Lee script for Black Marvel. I am, as you'll know, a fan, but this was dreadful stuff. I wonder what Kirby thought as ther Sixties approached and Lee became not just a boss, but a cultural icon of sorts? Did he recall how far behind him Lee had been in the Forties, and that Lee's "in" to the business came through family connections rather than hard work and artistic talent? Again, I say that believing that Lee has often been hard-done by in the credit he's given for the Marvel Revolution, but I just wonder how easy it was for Kirby to find himself working as he did both under and in collaboration with Lee?
Hi Colin,
ReplyDeleteIt is very hard to put yourself in the shoes of children first reading and seeing the work of Simon-Kirby, although so many were clearly affected by the work, including kids who would go on to work in comics like John Romita. One thing is certain: their work had an immediate IMPACT that jarred the reader like no one else in the field. There is an energy on the page that confronts the reader head-on; the pacing, layouts and art all made for a roller coaster ride that no one else was able to duplicate.
It also looks like Kirby inked some of those pages himself; the splash and page 5 look like his solo work to my eyes.
Thanks for another intriguing blog post.
http://nick-caputo.blogspot.com/2012/07/appreciating-don-heck.html
Hello Nick:- Thank you for being, as you've been, generous to a bloke who clearly knows far, far less about Simon and Kirby's work - and a great deal more - than I do. And hats off to you for the information about the probability that Kirby inked some of those pages.
DeleteI'm a genuine fan of Nick's blog, which folks who stumble down to here in these comments really should pop over and see. The Don Heck piece that Nick's left a link to above is well worth a read, to take but one example.